McMullan v. Abbott

1 Or. 258
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Wait, O. J.

It is insisted by McMullan, that he was entitled to days of grace upon this note, and this is the only question arising in the case. Suit was commenced on “ the 26th day of January, A. D. 1859and hence, if McMullan [259] was entitled to days of grace, the demurrer was well taken, for the reason that the suit was prematurely brought.

By the law merchant, if a promissory note was negotiable and payable on a day certain in the future, it was entitled to grace; if not negotiable, it was not entitled to grace. (Edwards on Promissory Notes, section 3, page 44.)

Our statute is an affirmance of the law merchant in this respect.

The note in question is not a negotiable promissory note, and grace could not be claimed upon it.

The judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullan v. Abbott, 1 Or. 258 (Or. 1859).

1 Or. 258 (McMullan v. Abbott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. O'Donald
28 F. 17 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1886)