McMinn v. Shultz

34 Ark. 627
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ark. 627 (McMinn v. Shultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMinn v. Shultz, 34 Ark. 627 (Ark. 1879).

Opinion

Harrison', J.

This was replevin for two bales of cotton, commenced before a justice of the peace by appellee against appellants. The plaintiff recovered judgment before the justice, and the defendants took an appeal to the circuit court. In the circuit court the plaintiff, as before the justice, recovered judgment for the cotton, or, if delivery could not be had, for the value thereof, found — and for his damages assessed.

The record presents no question for our decision. There appears in the transcript what purports to be a bill of exceptions, but which is not signed by the judge, and is, apparently, otherwise incomplete, which can not be considered as a part of the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Ark. 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcminn-v-shultz-ark-1879.