McMinn v. . Hamilton

77 N.C. 300
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Eairoloth, J.

(After stating the facts as above.) Where a Court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter, the objection can be taken at any time, and indeed as soon as thi$ fact is discovered, the Court mero motu will take notice of it and dismiss the action. But if it has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the venue is wrong, the objection must be taken in apt time ; and if the defendant pleads to the merits of the action, he will be taken to have waived the objection. He cannot have two chances.

Applying this principle to the case before us, we think the defendant waived the objection by pleading before the Justice and that it was then too late to raise it.

Error.

PER, CURIAM. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMinn v. . Hamilton, 77 N.C. 300 (N.C. 1877).

77 N.C. 300 (McMinn v. . Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re M.R.J.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2021
Clark v. . Homes
128 S.E. 20 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.
189 N.C. 703 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co. v. Lermuseaux
187 P. 560 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1920)
Brown v. . Harding
86 S.E. 1010 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
McArthur v. . Griffith
61 S.E. 519 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Farnsworth v. Union Pac. Coal Co.
89 P. 74 (Utah Supreme Court, 1907)
Burke v. Malaby and Gossnel
1904 OK 83 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1904)
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Gray
80 S.W. 748 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Shields v. Union Central Life Insurance
25 S.E. 951 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
Cherry v. . Lilly
18 S.E. 76 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
Granville County Board of Education v. State Board of Education
10 S.E. 1002 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Fields v. Maloney
78 Mo. 172 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Devereux v. . Devereux
81 N.C. 12 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)