McMillon v. State

492 S.W.3d 629, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 616, 2016 WL 3418454
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2016·No. No. ED 103258·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jeremiah McMillon (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an [630] evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that the motion court erred when it found that: (1) pretrial counsel was not ineffective for failing to challenge a lineup in which a victim identified Movant without Movant’s counsel present; and (2) appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to assert on appeal that multiple victim identifications should have been suppressed because they were the result of suggestive police procedures. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined' that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMillon v. State, 492 S.W.3d 629, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 616, 2016 WL 3418454 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

492 S.W.3d 629 (McMillon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.