McMillion v. Slab Fork Coal Co

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2007·No. 06-2132·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2132

JERRY D. MCMILLION,

Petitioner,

versus

SLAB FORK COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (06-0318-BLA)

Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 23, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry D. McMillion, Petitioner Pro Se. Waseem A. Karim, JACKSON & KELLY, Lexington, Kentucky; Patricia May Nece, Emily Goldberg- Kraft, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jerry D. McMillion seeks review of the Benefits Review

Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s

denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945

(2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s

decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the Board. McMillion v. Slab Fork Coal Co., No. 06-0318-BLA

(B.R.B. Aug. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMillion v. Slab Fork Coal Co, (4th Cir. 2007).

McMillion v. Slab Fork Coal Co (McMillion v. Slab Fork Coal Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-945
30 U.S.C. § 901-945
§ 901
30 U.S.C. § 901