McMillian v. Leconey

Fourth Circuit

McMillian v. Leconey

455 F. App'x 295

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2011·No. No. 11-1647·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric M. McMillian appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McMillian v. LeConey, No. 5:09-cv-00175-BR, 2011 WL 2144628 (E.D.N.C. filed May 31 & entered June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric M. McMillian appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McMillian v. LeConey, No. 5:09-cv-00175-BR, 2011 WL 2144628 (E.D.N.C. filed May 31 & entered June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McMillian v. Leconey, 455 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

455 F. App'x 295 (McMillian v. Leconey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related