McMillian v. City of Raleigh

441 F. App'x 154
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1417
StatusPublished

This text of 441 F. App'x 154 (McMillian v. City of Raleigh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMillian v. City of Raleigh, 441 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

[155]*155Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Eric M. McMillian and Linda C. Liverman appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ briefs. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants’ informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Appellants have forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F. App'x 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillian-v-city-of-raleigh-ca4-2011.