McMiller v. Cone Bros. Construction
This text of 201 So. 2d 67 (McMiller v. Cone Bros. Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[68]*68pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. The cross-petition is also denied.
The attorney for the petitioner Leroy McMiller is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 So. 2d 67, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmiller-v-cone-bros-construction-fla-1967.