McMillen v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

McMillen v. Smith

23 Ind. 168

DecidedNovember 15, 1864

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Ind. 168 (McMillen v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McMillen v. Smith, 23 Ind. 168 (Ind. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The same question is presented in this case, on demurrer to the complaint, as in the ease of McMillen v. Terrell at this term; and on the authority of that [169]*169case the judgment in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. Costs here.

Thomas A. Hendricks, Oscar B. Hord, and N. B. Lindsay, for appellant. H. A. Brouse and B. Vaile, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

The same question is presented in this case, on demurrer to the complaint, as in the ease of McMillen v. Terrell at this term; and on the authority of that [169]*169case the judgment in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. Costs here.

Thomas A. Hendricks, Oscar B. Hord, and N. B. Lindsay, for appellant. H. A. Brouse and B. Vaile, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Ind. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillen-v-smith-ind-1864.