McMillen v. Blattner

67 Iowa 287
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 23, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 Iowa 287 (McMillen v. Blattner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMillen v. Blattner, 67 Iowa 287 (iowa 1885).

Opinion

Seeyers, J.

Appellant concedes in an able and exhaustive printed argument that the only question for determination is whether the amendment to the constitution which was ratified by the people at a special election held on the twenty-seventh day of June, 1882, was constitutionally adopted and became á part of the constitution of this state. This question was considered and determined in Koehler v. Hill, 60 Iowa, 543. A petition for a rehearing was filed and granted. Able arguments were made on rehearing by distinguished counsel, and after mature consideration a majority of the court adhered to the conclusion reached in the original opinion, that the amendment to the constitution had not been constitutionally adopted, and therefore did not become a part of the constitution. After again considering this question, we are now con-' tent to say that we are not disposed to overrule the case cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Postel v. Marcus
152 N.W. 419 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Iowa 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillen-v-blattner-iowa-1885.