McMillan v. Stone

139 P. 753, 79 Wash. 119, 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1146
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 8, 1914
DocketNo. 11455
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 P. 753 (McMillan v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMillan v. Stone, 139 P. 753, 79 Wash. 119, 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1146 (Wash. 1914).

Opinion

Main, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover damages on account of the alleged conversion of an automobile. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

The facts as found by the trial court are: That, on or about the 28th day of February, 1912, the respondent was the owner of the automobile in question, and that, on or about that date, the appellant, without the consent of the respondent, took the automobile and converted it to his own use. That the automobile, at the time of the conversion, was worth $800, and that the respondent was damaged in that [120]*120sum. Judgment was entered against the appellant in this amount.

No statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been brought to this court; in the absence of which, the only question which can be considered is whether the findings of fact sustain the judgment. Of this, there can be no doubt. The trial court found that the respondent was the owner of the automobile, that it was wrongfully converted by the appellant, and that its value was the sum for which judgment was entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Crow, C. J., Ellis, Gose, and Chadwick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Machinery & Supply Co. v. Stuchell
150 P. 8 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 P. 753, 79 Wash. 119, 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillan-v-stone-wash-1914.