McMillan v. State
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction for burglary. Held:
The sole issue presented to this court is whether the trial judge erred in failing to declare a mistrial after testimony by one of the state’s witnesses concerning threatening letters he received. The record shows that the trial judge took prompt corrective action after which counsel for the defendant neither requested further instructions nor moved for a mistrial. Under these circumstances, the enumeration of error is without merit. Chandler v. State, 143 Ga. App. 608 (2) (239 SE2d 158).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
259 S.E.2d 102 (McMillan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.