McMillan v. State
135 So. 3d 386, 2014 WL 338503, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1141, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 256
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Hess v. State, 794 So.2d 1249, 1261 (Fla.2001) (“Because we find sufficient evidence of felony murder, we need not address appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to establish premeditation.”); see also Brooks v. State, 762 So.2d 879, 896 (Fla.2000); Brown v. State, 644 So.2d 52, 53 (Fla.1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McMillan v. State, 135 So. 3d 386, 2014 WL 338503, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1141, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 256 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
135 So. 3d 386 (McMillan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
644 So. 2d 52 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Brooks v. State
762 So. 2d 879 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Hess v. State
794 So. 2d 1249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)