McMillan v. McMillan

Mississippi Supreme Court

McMillan v. McMillan

262 So. 2d 781, 1972 Miss. LEXIS 1325

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 1972·No. No. 46723·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRADY, Justice:

There is no new rule of law involved in this cause. A careful reading of the record and a study of the briefs leads us to the inescapable conclusion that the chancellor had ample evidence upon which to base his findings of fact as expressed in his opinion. We cannot, therefore, say that he was manifestly wrong, and for this reason the decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH and SUGG, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRADY, Justice:

There is no new rule of law involved in this cause. A careful reading of the record and a study of the briefs leads us to the inescapable conclusion that the chancellor had ample evidence upon which to base his findings of fact as expressed in his opinion. We cannot, therefore, say that he was manifestly wrong, and for this reason the decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH and SUGG, JJ., concur.

McMillan v. McMillan, 262 So. 2d 781, 1972 Miss. LEXIS 1325 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

262 So. 2d 781 (McMillan v. McMillan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related