McMillan v. Lorimer

113 So. 812, 164 La. 185, 1927 La. LEXIS 1957
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 25, 1927
DocketNo. 28424.
StatusPublished

This text of 113 So. 812 (McMillan v. Lorimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMillan v. Lorimer, 113 So. 812, 164 La. 185, 1927 La. LEXIS 1957 (La. 1927).

Opinion

OVERTON, J.

The issues in this case are identical with those presented in the case of Joseph C. Marsh et al. v. Leonard Lorimer et al. (No. 28425) 113 So. 808, 1 this day decided. The contract sued on is identical with the contract sued on in that case, except that Marsh is not a party to the contract sued on here, and the lands contracted to be sold are different, and the amount paid by Lorimer, when he signed the contract sued on here, was $5,000 instead of $75,000. The judgment rendered by the trial court in this case is similar, except as to the amount of the moneyed judgment rendered in favor of Lorimer, to the judgment rendered in the Marsh" Case, and Lorimer asks for amendments to the judgment in this case similar to those prayed for in the Marsh Case. The evidence in the two cases is the same.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Joseph C. Marsh et al. v. Leonard Lorimer et al., this day decided, the judgment appealed from is amended by expressly rescinding the contract, here sought to be specifically enforced, and by making the interest run on said sum of $5,000 from May 25, 1920, instead of from July 16, 1923, and, as thus amended, said judgment is affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 175.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marsh v. Lorimer
113 So. 808 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 So. 812, 164 La. 185, 1927 La. LEXIS 1957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillan-v-lorimer-la-1927.