McMillan v. Jones

Fourth Circuit

McMillan v. Jones

673 F. App'x 321

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 2017

DocketNo. 16-6418

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 F. App'x 321 (McMillan v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McMillan v. Jones, 673 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward R. McMillan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McMillan v. Jones, No. 5:14-ct-03240-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward R. McMillan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McMillan v. Jones, No. 5:14-ct-03240-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 F. App'x 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillan-v-jones-ca4-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack