McMillan v. Johnson

132 So. 113, 100 Fla. 1702
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 12, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order. It is therefore considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed under authority of Willys-Overland, Inc. v. Blake, 97 Fla. 626, 121 So. R. 884; Feinberg v. Stearns, 56 Fla. 279, 47 So. R. 797, 131 Am. St. R. 119; Hunter v. State Bank of Florida, 65 Fla. 202, 61 So. R. 497.

*1703 Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMillan v. Johnson, 132 So. 113, 100 Fla. 1702 (Fla. 1931).

132 So. 113 (McMillan v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willys Overland, Inc. v. Blake
121 So. 884 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Feinberg v. Stearns
56 Fla. 279 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Hunter v. State Bank
61 So. 497 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)