McMillan v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation
22 So. 3d 833, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17716, 2009 WL 4060906
Opinion
Affirmed. See Shojaie v. Gables Court Prof'l Ctr., Inc., 974 So.2d 1140, 1141-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that employee failed to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter on appeal, requiring affirmance); Mendez v. Fla. Dep’t of Health, 943 So.2d 909, 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“The Board’s imposition of a penalty is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McMillan v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, 22 So. 3d 833, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17716, 2009 WL 4060906 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
22 So. 3d 833 (McMillan v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mendez v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF HEALTH
943 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Shojaie v. GCPC
974 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)