Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McMillan v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation

McMillan v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation

22 So. 3d 833, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17716, 2009 WL 4060906
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 25, 2009
Docket3D08-3002
StatusPublished

This text of 22 So. 3d 833 (McMillan v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMillan v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, 22 So. 3d 833, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17716, 2009 WL 4060906 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Shojaie v. Gables Court Prof'l Ctr., Inc., 974 So.2d 1140, 1141-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that employee failed to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter on appeal, requiring affirmance); Mendez v. Fla. Dep’t of Health, 943 So.2d 909, 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“The Board’s imposition of a penalty is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendez v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF HEALTH
943 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Shojaie v. GCPC
974 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 So. 3d 833, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17716, 2009 WL 4060906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillan-v-department-of-business-and-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-2009.