McMillan v. Bell
This text of 30 S.E. 948 (McMillan v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. When a petition such as is authorized by section 1546 of the Political Code, for the purpose of instituting a contest relating to an election concerning the sale of liquors, is presented to a judge of [497]*497the superior court, it becomes his duty to grant the order provided for in that section requiring three justices of the peace to recount the ballots. Such order is indispensable to the further progress of the case made by the petition, and if the judge refuses to grant it the case is at an end, and no further proceedings therein can be lawfully had. This being so, a refusal to grant such an order is not a proper matter for exception pendente lite, but for direct exception within the time prescribed by law for bringing final judgments to this court for review.
:2. While the above seems to be clear, the section mentioned is in other respects involved in so much obscurity and uncertainty that it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain its true intent and meaning, , and. .beyond doubt it greatly needs legislative revision.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E. 948, 105 Ga. 496, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmillan-v-bell-ga-1898.