McMichen v. State
170 S.E. 301, 47 Ga. App. 240, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 359
This text of 170 S.E. 301 (McMichen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McMichen v. State, 170 S.E. 301, 47 Ga. App. 240, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
In repeated rulings of this court, presence at a still in actual operation, and flight therefrom on approach of officers, has been held sufficient to sustain a conviction of manufacturing whisky. The explanation of such presence is a question for the jury. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fair v. State
142 S.E.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Johnson v. State
53 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 S.E. 301, 47 Ga. App. 240, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmichen-v-state-gactapp-1933.