McMichen v. State
170 S.E. 301, 47 Ga. App. 240, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 359
Opinion
In repeated rulings of this court, presence at a still in actual operation, and flight therefrom on approach of officers, has been held sufficient to sustain a conviction of manufacturing whisky. The explanation of such presence is a question for the jury. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McMichen v. State, 170 S.E. 301, 47 Ga. App. 240, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
170 S.E. 301 (McMichen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fair v. State
142 S.E.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Johnson v. State
53 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)