McMenamy v. SSM Healthcare St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

McMenamy v. SSM Healthcare St. Louis

381 S.W.3d 403, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2012 WL 4888318

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 97937·Published

Opinion

[404] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Katherine McMenamy (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission concluding that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she committed misconduct connected with work as defined by section 288.030.1(23) RSMo 2009.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The commission’s decision is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[404] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Katherine McMenamy (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission concluding that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she committed misconduct connected with work as defined by section 288.030.1(23) RSMo 2009.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The commission’s decision is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

McMenamy v. SSM Healthcare St. Louis, 381 S.W.3d 403, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2012 WL 4888318 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

381 S.W.3d 403 (McMenamy v. SSM Healthcare St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.