McMenamin v. EVESHAM MUN. UTIL. AUTHORITY
256 A.2d 801, 107 N.J. Super. 42
Opinion
FRANCIS B. McMENAMIN AND ROSE M. McMENAMIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC UNDER N.J.S.A. 14B-4, 5 AND 6, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM, BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.
Mr. William B. Colsey III argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Powell and Davis, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph S. Georgiana argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Capehart and Scatchard, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment herein is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Wick in the Chancery Division, 104 N.J. Super. 161 (1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McMenamin v. EVESHAM MUN. UTIL. AUTHORITY, 256 A.2d 801, 107 N.J. Super. 42 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).
256 A.2d 801 (McMenamin v. EVESHAM MUN. UTIL. AUTHORITY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McMenamin v. Evesham Municipal Util. Authority
249 A.2d 21 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
McMenamin v. Evesham Municipal Utilities Authority
256 A.2d 801 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)