McMechen Volunteer Fire Dept. v. Jeannette Rose, Widow

CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 29, 2018
Docket18-0178
StatusPublished

This text of McMechen Volunteer Fire Dept. v. Jeannette Rose, Widow (McMechen Volunteer Fire Dept. v. Jeannette Rose, Widow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMechen Volunteer Fire Dept. v. Jeannette Rose, Widow, (W. Va. 2018).

Opinion

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

MCMECHEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC., FILED Employer Below, Petitioner May 29, 2018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs.) No. 18-0178 (BOR Appeal No. 2052094) OF WEST VIRGINIA

(Claim No. 2015025832)

JEANNETTE ROSE, WIDOW OF GARRY ROSE, Claimant Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner McMechen Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., by Daniel Murdock, its attorney, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Jeannette Rose, widow of Garry Rose, by Jeffrey Kessler, its attorney, filed a timely response.

The issue on appeal is dependent’s benefits. The claims administrator denied dependent’s benefits on March 23, 2015. The Office of Judges reversed the decision in its June 23, 2017, Order and granted dependent’s benefits. The Order was affirmed by the Board of Review on January 31, 2018. The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration.

This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Garry Rose, a firefighter and EMT, died in the course of his employment on February 6, 2015. A treatment note from Ohio Valley Medical Center that day indicates Mr. Rose, who was sixty-seven, was performing his duties as an EMT when he brought a patient to the emergency room. While there, Mr. Rose collapsed, was unable to be revived, and passed away. The clinical impression was cardiac arrest.

In a witness statement, Susan Rucki, an EMT who worked with Mr. Rose, stated that on that day, she and Mr. Rose were called out for an emergency. They met at the patient’s house, 1

carried him down the stairs, and loaded him into the ambulance. Mr. Rose then drove to the emergency room and helped move the patient to a bed. He then cleaned and redressed the ambulance cot and loaded it back into the ambulance. Ms. Rucki stated that she was waiting in the lobby when she saw Mr. Rose collapse to the ground. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was immediately started but he did not respond. Ms. Rucki also completed an incident report in which she stated that she and Mr. Rose were dispatched in the early hours of February 5, 2016, to assist with a patient. Ms. Rucki stated that she was about four feet from Mr. Rose when he collapsed. Though cardiopulmonary resuscitation was immediately started, Mr. Rose did not respond and was pronounced dead.

Crystal Brown also gave a statement regarding Mr. Rose’s death. She stated that she was an EMT and responded to the same call as Mr. Rose on February 5, 2016. Ms. Brown noted that the patient weighed between 100 and 130 pounds. Ms. Brown stated that she, Mr. Rose, Ms. Rucki, and two police officers carried the patient down a set of stairs and loaded him into the ambulance. Mr. Rose then drove the ambulance to the hospital, pushed the patient into the emergency room, and assisted with the transfer to a bed. Ms. Brown also completed an incident report in which she reiterated that she and Mr. Rose were called to the house of an unresponsive male on February 5, 2016. They loaded the patient into the ambulance and transported him to the emergency room. While there, Mr. Rose collapsed and ultimately died.

The death certificate lists the cause of death as hypertension and arteriosclerotic heart disease. On March 31, 2015, a report of death investigation and post-mortem examination findings was completed by Joseph DelTondo, D.O., Chief Deputy Medical Examiner. The report indicates Mr. Rose had a history of hypertension, high cholesterol, seizures, and a family history of heart attacks. Mr. Rose collapsed at work and after forty minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, was pronounced dead. The autopsy showed hypertension and arteriosclerotic heart disease as well as adrenal cortical adenoma. Dr. DelTondo opined that Mr. Rose died due to hypertensive and arteriosclerotic heart disease. The manner of death was listed as natural.

On May 19, 2015, James Comerci, M.D., Mr. Rose’s family physician, completed a report opining that Mr. Rose’s physical and emotional exertion during his job duties as an EMT were directly related to his death. He asserted that the activity of transporting the patient contributed to the sudden cardiovascular event.

Ms. Rucki testified in a deposition on December 31, 2015, that she was called to a patient’s house on February 5, 2016, and met Mr. Rose there. She stated that after they got the patient loaded onto a cot, she, Mr. Rose, and two police officers carried him down a large number of stairs. She stated that Mr. Rose carried the bulk of the weight. After they arrived at the emergency room, they transferred the patient to a cot and then Mr. Rose redressed and reloaded the cot. She was standing approximately four feet from Mr. Rose when he collapsed, which was approximately five minutes after they arrived at the hospital. Ms. Rucki stated that Mr. Rose did not appear to be in distress over the course of the evening. She testified that the house they were called to had approximately twenty steps which were very steep and uneven. Mr. Rose went up and down them at least twice, once with a patient. She stated that he was at the head of the cot and took most of the weight. Ms. Rucki opined that it was an incredibly tiring call, and she was 2

exhausted and sweating by the time it was finished, as was Mr. Rose. She stated that it was a high exertion, high stress, and high anxiety transport because the patient was unresponsive and seizing and they had to move as quickly as possible to get him to the emergency room. Once they got to the emergency room, Mr. Rose took the lead because he never let female coworkers take the bulk of the weight, and he did the most strenuous part of the job. Ms. Rucki stated that it probably takes five to ten minutes for her blood pressure and pulse to calm down after a transport. While she was waiting for paper work, Mr. Rose was standing four feet away and appeared to be sweating and in a stressful physical exertion stage. Ms. Rucki testified that he convulsed briefly and then collapsed.

Ms. Brown also testified in a deposition on December 31, 2015. She stated that she worked with Mr. Rose for about two years. On February 5, 2016, she arrived at a call with Mr. Rose. When they got there, they realized the patient was completely unresponsive. She stated that they did not run up the stairs because they were steep and uneven but they walked as quickly as possible. Mr. Rose went up and down the stairs twice, once while helping to carry the patient. Ms. Brown stated that Mr. Rose was a gentleman and performed the bulk of the lifting when possible, including when they arrived at the emergency room early that morning.

Dr. Comerci testified in a deposition on November 15, 2016, that he is board certified in family medicine and had been Mr. Rose’s family doctor. It was his opinion that the physical and emotional exertion during Mr. Rose’s duties as a first responder were directly related to his sudden death, and the activity that day contributed to his sudden cardiovascular event. Dr. Comerci stated that he reviewed Mr. Rose’s medical records, the autopsy, and the emergency room records from the date he died. Mr. Rose had arterial bypass surgery five to seven years before his death but had no complaints of chest pain or other cardiovascular problems. Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McMechen Volunteer Fire Dept. v. Jeannette Rose, Widow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmechen-volunteer-fire-dept-v-jeannette-rose-widow-wva-2018.