McManus v. State Farm Insurance Co.
512 So. 2d 344, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2242, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10244
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 1987·No. No. 4-86-2168·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
We reverse and remand. Although the trial court properly granted the motion to dismiss appellant’s pro se complaint, the record fails to reflect sufficient justification for a dismissal with prejudice. Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. Wilson, 448 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McManus v. State Farm Insurance Co., 512 So. 2d 344, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2242, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10244 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
512 So. 2d 344 (McManus v. State Farm Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
General Acc. Ins. Co. v. Packal
512 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)