McManus v. State Farm Insurance Co.
512 So. 2d 344, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2242, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10244
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 16, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-2168
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 512 So. 2d 344 (McManus v. State Farm Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McManus v. State Farm Insurance Co., 512 So. 2d 344, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2242, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10244 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinions
We reverse and remand. Although the trial court properly granted the motion to dismiss appellant’s pro se complaint, the record fails to reflect sufficient justification for a dismissal with prejudice. Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. Wilson, 448 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
General Acc. Ins. Co. v. Packal
512 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
512 So. 2d 344, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2242, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmanus-v-state-farm-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1987.