McManus v. Laughlin

40 A. 992, 186 Pa. 498, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 1034
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 21, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 110·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal by Annie G. Summers is from the decree dismissing exceptions, confirming the auditor’s report and ordering distribution in accordance therewith.

[508] It is unnecessary to refer in detail to the forty-seven exceptions to the auditor’s report, filed on behalf of appellant, or to the several questions involved in the assignments of error. To do so would consume much time to no good purpose. It is sufficient to say, as the result of a careful examination of the record, that the court below was clearly right in approving the learned auditor’s findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its decree is based. We find nothing in the record that requires either a reversal or modification of the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McManus v. Laughlin, 40 A. 992, 186 Pa. 498, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 1034 (Pa. 1898).

40 A. 992 (McManus v. Laughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West Virginia Water Service Co. v. Cunningham
98 S.E.2d 891 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1957)
Truck Tractor & Forwarding Co. v. Baker
126 A. 239 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Little v. William F. Fearon & Co.
97 A. 578 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)