McManus v. Gambill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

McManus v. Gambill

299 S.E.2d 479, 60 N.C. App. 600, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2483

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 1, 1983

DocketNo. 8223SC234

StatusPublished

This text of 299 S.E.2d 479 (McManus v. Gambill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McManus v. Gambill, 299 S.E.2d 479, 60 N.C. App. 600, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2483 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Since, under Rule 28(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, our review is limited to questions presented by the appellant’s brief, the appeal must be dismissed.

The correctness of the summary judgment eliminating B & B Used Cars and the defendant Burke from the case not having been presented for our consideration, no opinion is expressed about it. Nor can we consider the insurance question that was presented, since that question was not ruled on by the trial judge.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Webb and BECTON concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Since, under Rule 28(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, our review is limited to questions presented by the appellant’s brief, the appeal must be dismissed.

The correctness of the summary judgment eliminating B & B Used Cars and the defendant Burke from the case not having been presented for our consideration, no opinion is expressed about it. Nor can we consider the insurance question that was presented, since that question was not ruled on by the trial judge.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Webb and BECTON concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 S.E.2d 479, 60 N.C. App. 600, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmanus-v-gambill-ncctapp-1983.