McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc.

89 So. 2d 349, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4101
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 31, 1956·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that -it is-manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need! no further argument; • -

[350]*350It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to 'affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., and ROWE, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc., 89 So. 2d 349, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4101 (Fla. 1956).

89 So. 2d 349 (McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. v. Tax Assessor
30 Fla. Supp. 45 (Duval County Circuit Court, 1968)
Adams v. Wolf
137 So. 705 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)