McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc.

89 So. 2d 349, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4101
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 So. 2d 349 (McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc., 89 So. 2d 349, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4101 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that -it is-manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need! no further argument; • -

[350]*350It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to 'affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., and ROWE, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. v. Tax Assessor
30 Fla. Supp. 45 (Duval County Circuit Court, 1968)
Adams v. Wolf
137 So. 705 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 So. 2d 349, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmannus-v-midland-constructors-inc-fla-1956.