McMail v. Michaels
This text of 147 N.Y.S. 516 (McMail v. Michaels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant took the property under the chattel mortgage for conceded default in performance of the conditions stipulated. The plaintiff had no right left but redemption in equity. The defendant is not liable either for conversion or for the return of the money paid on the furniture under section 65 of the Personal Property Law (Consol. Laws, c. 41). This is not a case of conditional sale, for the title passed to the plaintiff on the sale and back to defendant under the chattel mortgage. That defendant took property not covered by the mortgage was disputed, and the judgment on the second cause of action will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 N.Y.S. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmail-v-michaels-nyappterm-1914.