McMahon v. Treasurer of Missouri

292 S.W.3d 606, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2009 WL 3050914
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 2009·No. ED 92524·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert McMahon (“Appellant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Commission (“Commission”) affirming the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that Appellant failed to prove that he is permanently and totally disabled. On appeal, Appellant argues that the ALJ findings that Appellant failed to prove by competent and substantial evidence that he is totally and permanently disabled as a result of a work related injury are unsupported by substantial evidence and contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence contained in the record. We find no error and affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahon v. Treasurer of Missouri, 292 S.W.3d 606, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2009 WL 3050914 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

292 S.W.3d 606 (McMahon v. Treasurer of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Care & Treatment of Morton v. State
292 S.W.3d 606 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)