McMahon v. Staten Island Coach Co.
This text of 248 A.D. 908 (McMahon v. Staten Island Coach Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action in negligence, arising out of a collision between a taxicab and a bus. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur for affirmance of the judgment in so far as it is in favor of plaintiffs Margaret O’Neill, as limited administratrix of the goods, chattels and credits of Adele Douglas, deceased, and George Parmentell, but dissent and vote for reversal of the judgment and for a new trial in so far as it is in favor of plaintiff Frances McMahon, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury in favor of that plaintiff is excessive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 908, 291 N.Y.S. 409, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmahon-v-staten-island-coach-co-nyappdiv-1936.