McMahon v. Harrison

5 How. Pr. 360
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 1851·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Rüggles, Ch. J.

The appeal having been made before the amount of the costs were ascertained, and the judgment roll filed, it was premature. Until the costs are taxed or settled it can not be known, in cases in which the proceedings are to be stayed, in what sum the sureties are to justify; and it is better that the practice should be the same where the proceedings are not stayed as where they are. The party desiring to appeal may by motion and order in the court in which the judgment is rendered, compel the other to perfect his judgment, if he delays to do so. The appeal must therefore be dismissed, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahon v. Harrison, 5 How. Pr. 360 (N.Y. 1851).

5 How. Pr. 360 (McMahon v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Rogers
35 N.W. 270 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1887)
Andrews v. Welch
47 Wis. 132 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)
Smith v. Hart
44 Wis. 230 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1878)
Rosenfield v. Palmer
5 Daly 318 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1874)