McMahon v. Folds

121 S.E.2d 192, 104 Ga. App. 125, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 621
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 22, 1961·No. 38909·Published

Opinion

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

The bill of exceptions in this case, after reciting the final judgment of the court, states merely that “Plaintiff disagrees with this ruling.” A bill of exceptions containing no assignment of error cannot be entertained by this court. Lawson v. Brown, 31 Ga. App. 302 (120 SE 550). Examination of the record in the Lawson case shows that it recited only: “The judgment in said case was adverse to petitioner and he is dissatisfied therewith.” In neither case does the bill of exceptions “specify plainly . . . the alleged error” as required by Code Ann. § 6-901, and the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is therefore meritorious.

[126] Decided June 22, 1961 Rehearing denied July 7, 1961. A. B. Parker, for plaintiff in error. O. W. Roberts, Jr., contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahon v. Folds, 121 S.E.2d 192, 104 Ga. App. 125, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961).

121 S.E.2d 192 (McMahon v. Folds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawson v. Brown
120 S.E. 550 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)