McMahon v. Crockett

1 Minor 362
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

Judge Saffold

delivered the opinion of the Court."

The charge of the Circuit Court was erroneous. The -note was evidence of the consideration. Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded.

Judge Minor having presided in the Court below, did not sit.

Note. — On the trial in the Circuit Court the Judge was of opinion that the second plea mentioned should have been. demurredto, and that the plaintiff holding the affirmative of the issue had taken the burthen of proof on himself; but it seems to have been held otherwise in the decisions in Kentucky, where the Statute is similar to ours. See 1 Littell, 257, 265. Laws Ala. 462, s. 3, 4. 1 Marshall, 602, 332, 3 Bibb. 264, 4 Bibb. 67.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahon v. Crockett, 1 Minor 362 (Ala. 1824).

1 Minor 362 (McMahon v. Crockett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owings v. Beall
11 Ky. 257 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1822)