McMahon v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McMahon v. City of New York

108 A.D.2d 902, 486 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.2d 902 (McMahon v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McMahon v. City of New York, 108 A.D.2d 902, 486 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), entered September 1, 1983, which, upon a finding that defendant was 70% responsible for the injuries suffered by plaintiff, awarded plaintiff damages.

Judgment reversed, on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Under the totality of the circumstances, we find the verdict to be contrary to the weight of the credible evidence and a new trial is therefore required. Because a new trial is required, we note that the points raised by defendant on appeal concerning allegedly erroneous evidentiary rulings and an allegedly erroneous charge have been considered and have been found to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), entered September 1, 1983, which, upon a finding that defendant was 70% responsible for the injuries suffered by plaintiff, awarded plaintiff damages.

Judgment reversed, on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Under the totality of the circumstances, we find the verdict to be contrary to the weight of the credible evidence and a new trial is therefore required. Because a new trial is required, we note that the points raised by defendant on appeal concerning allegedly erroneous evidentiary rulings and an allegedly erroneous charge have been considered and have been found to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.2d 902, 486 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmahon-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1985.