McMahon v. American Railway Express Company

144 A. 920, 105 N.J.L. 494, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 253
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 4, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 144 A. 920 (McMahon v. American Railway Express Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMahon v. American Railway Express Company, 144 A. 920, 105 N.J.L. 494, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 253 (N.J. 1929).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiebk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 A. 920, 105 N.J.L. 494, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmahon-v-american-railway-express-company-nj-1929.