McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc.

122 A.D.2d 411, 505 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59723

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 17, 1986·Published

Opinion

— Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Prior, Jr., J.), entered October 17, 1985 in Rensselaer County, which granted defendant summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Special Term correctly found that the unilaterally prepared handbook and policy statement did not create an employment contract between the parties (see, O’Connor v Eastman Kodak Co., 65 NY2d 724, 725; Citera v Chemical Bank, 105 AD2d 636; Patrowich v Chemical Bank, 98 AD2d 318, 322-323, affd 63 NY2d 541). The order should therefore be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Prior, Jr., J.), entered October 17, 1985 in Rensselaer County, which granted defendant summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Special Term correctly found that the unilaterally prepared handbook and policy statement did not create an employment contract between the parties (see, O’Connor v Eastman Kodak Co., 65 NY2d 724, 725; Citera v Chemical Bank, 105 AD2d 636; Patrowich v Chemical Bank, 98 AD2d 318, 322-323, affd 63 NY2d 541). The order should therefore be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc., 122 A.D.2d 411, 505 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

122 A.D.2d 411 (McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related