McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc.

122 A.D.2d 411, 505 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59723

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 17, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.2d 411 (McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McMahon v. Adirondack Specialty Adhesives, Inc., 122 A.D.2d 411, 505 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Prior, Jr., J.), entered October 17, 1985 in Rensselaer County, which granted defendant summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Special Term correctly found that the unilaterally prepared handbook and policy statement did not create an employment contract between the parties (see, O’Connor v Eastman Kodak Co., 65 NY2d 724, 725; Citera v Chemical Bank, 105 AD2d 636; Patrowich v Chemical Bank, 98 AD2d 318, 322-323, affd 63 NY2d 541). The order should therefore be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Prior, Jr., J.), entered October 17, 1985 in Rensselaer County, which granted defendant summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Special Term correctly found that the unilaterally prepared handbook and policy statement did not create an employment contract between the parties (see, O’Connor v Eastman Kodak Co., 65 NY2d 724, 725; Citera v Chemical Bank, 105 AD2d 636; Patrowich v Chemical Bank, 98 AD2d 318, 322-323, affd 63 NY2d 541). The order should therefore be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 411, 505 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmahon-v-adirondack-specialty-adhesives-inc-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack