McMahan v. Foy

61 So. 421, 104 Miss. 309
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 So. 421 (McMahan v. Foy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMahan v. Foy, 61 So. 421, 104 Miss. 309 (Mich. 1913).

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant attempted to probate a claim against the estate of D. J. McDonald, deceased, the probation and payment of which was contested by the adminstrator. The claim was represented by a written receipt signed by deceased. Appellant did not present this receipt to the clerk, but did present a copy thereof, which copy was indorsed by the clerk, “Probated and allowed.” The chancellor, after hearing evidence, disallowed the claim; therefore this appeal.

“Any person desiring to probate his claim shall present to the clerk the written evidence thereof, if any,” is the language of section 2106 of the Code of 1906 applicable to this controversy. Counsel for appellant contends that a copy of the written evidence is all the statute requires, because the word ‘ ‘ original” written evidence was not employed by the legislature. The statute is plain, unambiguous, and not susceptible to misconstruction; it is easily complied with, and must be complied with before a claim of this character can be probated and allowed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. Estate of Williamson
138 So. 2d 742 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1962)
Rice Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Monsour
174 So. 63 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1937)
Jennings v. Lowery Berry
112 So. 692 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 So. 421, 104 Miss. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmahan-v-foy-miss-1913.