M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator

1 Grant 307

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 1, 1856

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Grant 307 (M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator, 1 Grant 307 (Pa. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion.

Per. Curiam.

— The District Court entered judgment for the smaller amount named in the verdict, because, among other reasons, the plaintiff could have recovered no more if the lease contracted for had actually been executed, and the lessee had afterwards been evicted by the remainderman, after the death of the tenant for life. The argument of the learned judge is so entirely satisfactory on this point, that we have no occasion to add anything to it. And as it is conclusive of the case, we do not need to view it in any other aspect.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion.

Per. Curiam.

— The District Court entered judgment for the smaller amount named in the verdict, because, among other reasons, the plaintiff could have recovered no more if the lease contracted for had actually been executed, and the lessee had afterwards been evicted by the remainderman, after the death of the tenant for life. The argument of the learned judge is so entirely satisfactory on this point, that we have no occasion to add anything to it. And as it is conclusive of the case, we do not need to view it in any other aspect.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Grant 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclowry-v-croghans-administrator-pa-1856.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack