M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator

31 Pa. 22

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 1, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 31 Pa. 22 (M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Clowry v. Croghan's Administrator, 31 Pa. 22 (Pa. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The District Court entered judgment for the smaller amount named in the verdict, because, among other reasons, the plaintiff could not have recovered more if the lease contracted for had actually been executed, and the lessee had after- . wards been evicted by the remainder-man after the death of the tenant for life. The argument of the learned judge is so entirely satisfactory on this point, that we have no occasion to add anything to it; and as it is conclusive of the cause, we do not need to view it in any other aspect.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The District Court entered judgment for the smaller amount named in the verdict, because, among other reasons, the plaintiff could not have recovered more if the lease contracted for had actually been executed, and the lessee had after- . wards been evicted by the remainder-man after the death of the tenant for life. The argument of the learned judge is so entirely satisfactory on this point, that we have no occasion to add anything to it; and as it is conclusive of the cause, we do not need to view it in any other aspect.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Pa. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclowry-v-croghans-administrator-pa-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack