Mclouth Steel Corporation v. Henry J. Kaiser Company
This text of 277 F.2d 458 (Mclouth Steel Corporation v. Henry J. Kaiser Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
277 F.2d 458
McLOUTH STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
HENRY J. KAISER COMPANY, Vereinigte Oesterreichische Eisen Und Stahlwerke Aktiengesellschaft, and Brassert Oxygen Technik A.G., Appellees.
No. 14010.
No. 14011.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
March 28, 1960.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Detroit; Ralph M. Freeman, Judge.
William B. Cudlip, T. Donald Wade of Dickinson, Wright, Davis, McKean & Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., John Vaughan Groner, Ronald F. Ball of Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, for appellant.
George E. Brand, George E. Brand, Jr., Detroit, Mich., John A. Dienner, Edward C. Grelle, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and BOYD, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the Court being duly advised;
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Ralph M. Freeman, D.C., 175 F.Supp. 743, denying appellant's motion for a summary judgment and granting appellees' motion for a summary judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 F.2d 458, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 4, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclouth-steel-corporation-v-henry-j-kaiser-company-ca6-1960.