McLoughlin v. McMeekan
251 A.D. 844, 298 N.Y.S. 484
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 1937
StatusPublished
This text of 251 A.D. 844 (McLoughlin v. McMeekan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McLoughlin v. McMeekan, 251 A.D. 844, 298 N.Y.S. 484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
On argument, order in so far as it denies defendant’s motion to strike out plaintiff’s reply as sham and frivolous affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 844, 298 N.Y.S. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcloughlin-v-mcmeekan-nyappdiv-1937.