McLoughlin v. McLoughlin
This text of 49 A.D.2d 911 (McLoughlin v. McLoughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover money awarded in a Florida divorce judgment, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 16, 1974, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under CPLR 3213, and (2) the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements. An allegation of false testimony is not the type of extrinsic fraud that will allow one State to deny a sister State’s judgment full faith and credit. Hopkins, Acting P. J.. Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.2d 911, 374 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcloughlin-v-mcloughlin-nyappdiv-1975.