McLoughlin v. McLoughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McLoughlin v. McLoughlin

49 A.D.2d 911, 374 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11160

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover money awarded in a Florida divorce judgment, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 16, 1974, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under CPLR 3213, and (2) the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements. An allegation of false testimony is not the type of extrinsic fraud that will allow one State to deny a sister State’s judgment full faith and credit. Hopkins, Acting P. J.. Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover money awarded in a Florida divorce judgment, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 16, 1974, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under CPLR 3213, and (2) the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements. An allegation of false testimony is not the type of extrinsic fraud that will allow one State to deny a sister State’s judgment full faith and credit. Hopkins, Acting P. J.. Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

McLoughlin v. McLoughlin, 49 A.D.2d 911, 374 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

49 A.D.2d 911 (McLoughlin v. McLoughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related