McLeod v. Whitney Stores, Inc.

157 S.E.2d 254, 250 S.C. 273, 1967 S.C. LEXIS 189
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 11, 1967·No. 18713·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action brought by Edward A. McLeod, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Florence County, to, enjoin the *275 defendants from violating Sections 64-2 to -2.2, Code of 1962, (Cum. Supp.), by carrying on their ordinary business of selling goods, wares and merchandise on Sunday. Section 64-2.4, id., which is invoked by the complaint, authorizes .any State, county or municipal law enforcement officer to apply for such an injunction. The defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground of defect of parties “in that Section 10-1802, S. C. Code of Laws, 1962, does not permit a Sheriff to maintain an action in his own name or in his official capacity to abate a public nuisance.” The circuit court overruled the demurrer, and the defendants have appealed.

Section 10-1802, Co,de of 1962, is part of an act of 1918, 30 Stat. 814, relating to houses of assignation and prostitution. It is wholly inapplicable to the conduct against which the Sheriff seeks an injunction under Section 64-2.4, supra. It is, therefore, without legal significance that Section 10-1802 does not permit the Shériff to maintain this action. The demurrer on this ground is without merit and was properly overruled.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. Whitney Stores, Inc., 157 S.E.2d 254, 250 S.C. 273, 1967 S.C. LEXIS 189 (S.C. 1967).

157 S.E.2d 254 (McLeod v. Whitney Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitney Trading Corp. v. McNair
176 S.E.2d 572 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)