Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McLeod v. State

McLeod v. State

890 So. 2d 553, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 182, 2005 WL 74111
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2005
DocketNo. 5D04-4157
StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 553 (McLeod v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLeod v. State, 890 So. 2d 553, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 182, 2005 WL 74111 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wayne McLeod appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, in which he contended that he should not have been convicted of failure to register as a sex offender. It appears that Mr. McLeod is not challenging his sentence. Instead, he is attempting to challenge his conviction. A challenge to a conviction is not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a). See e.g., Cook v. State, 885 So.2d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Oxendine v. State, 852 So.2d 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. State
885 So. 2d 911 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Oxendine v. State
852 So. 2d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 553, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 182, 2005 WL 74111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcleod-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.