McLeod v. Sloop Triton

Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court

McLeod v. Sloop Triton

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 527

DecidedAugust 18, 1750

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 527 (McLeod v. Sloop Triton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLeod v. Sloop Triton, 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 527 (R.I. Super. Ct. 1750).

Pincite

Opinion

That Abraham Borden comes into Court and make the following plea in behalf of the Respondents That the within Mentioned Borden ■ — - Wanton — Cornell and tucker were not at that time sole Owners of said sloop, and therefore think the [libel] ought not to take place

Am Borden

Colony of Rhode Island etc. At a Court of Vice Admiralty held at Newport In the Colony aforesaid on Saturday the Eighteenth of Augst A. D. 1750.

Present the Honorable Sam11 Wickham Esq. Dy. Judge The Court being opened.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

That Abraham Borden comes into Court and make the following plea in behalf of the Respondents That the within Mentioned Borden ■ — - Wanton — Cornell and tucker were not at that time sole Owners of said sloop, and therefore think the [libel] ought not to take place

Am Borden

Colony of Rhode Island etc. At a Court of Vice Admiralty held at Newport In the Colony aforesaid on Saturday the Eighteenth of Augst A. D. 1750.

Present the Honorable Sam11 Wickham Esq. Dy. Judge The Court being opened.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcleod-v-sloop-triton-riviceadmct-1750.