McLeod v. Sloop Triton

Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court

McLeod v. Sloop Triton

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 527

Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court·Decided August 18, 1750·Published

Opinion

That Abraham Borden comes into Court and make the following plea in behalf of the Respondents That the within Mentioned Borden ■ — - Wanton — Cornell and tucker were not at that time sole Owners of said sloop, and therefore think the [libel] ought not to take place

Am Borden

Colony of Rhode Island etc. At a Court of Vice Admiralty held at Newport In the Colony aforesaid on Saturday the Eighteenth of Augst A. D. 1750.

Present the Honorable Sam11 Wickham Esq. Dy. Judge The Court being opened.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

That Abraham Borden comes into Court and make the following plea in behalf of the Respondents That the within Mentioned Borden ■ — - Wanton — Cornell and tucker were not at that time sole Owners of said sloop, and therefore think the [libel] ought not to take place

Am Borden

Colony of Rhode Island etc. At a Court of Vice Admiralty held at Newport In the Colony aforesaid on Saturday the Eighteenth of Augst A. D. 1750.

Present the Honorable Sam11 Wickham Esq. Dy. Judge The Court being opened.

McLeod v. Sloop Triton, 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 527 (R.I. Super. Ct. 1750).

Pincite

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 527 (McLeod v. Sloop Triton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.