McLeod v. Pee Dee Knitting Mills

121 S.E. 373, 127 S.C. 482, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 143
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 11, 1924
Docket11419
StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E. 373 (McLeod v. Pee Dee Knitting Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLeod v. Pee Dee Knitting Mills, 121 S.E. 373, 127 S.C. 482, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 143 (S.C. 1924).

Opinion

*483 The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The “Case” contains this statement: That the action is “a suit for damages for the high-handed, unlawful, etc., withholding of wages alleged to be due the appellant by the respondent.” Inasmuch as the defendant admits in its an-, swer that there is due the plaintiff $5.46 upon account of wages, regardless of the issue of punitive damages, the non-suit should not have been ordered.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and that the case be remanded to that Court for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 373, 127 S.C. 482, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcleod-v-pee-dee-knitting-mills-sc-1924.