McLeod v. . Lemons

117 S.E. 562, 185 N.C. 610, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 129
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 26, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a collision between plaintiff’s buggy and defendant’s automobile, plaintiff alleges that he was thrown to the ground and seriously injured. There was evidence tending to support the jury’s finrL'-ng on the first and second issues; and we have found no reversible error committed on the trial.

*611 It is well established that in an action like 'the present the contributory negligence of the plaintiff which proximately- produces the injury will bar a recovery. Construction Co. v. R. R., 184 N. C., 179; Moore v. Iron Works, 183 N. C., 438.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. . Lemons, 117 S.E. 562, 185 N.C. 610, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 129 (N.C. 1923).

117 S.E. 562 (McLeod v. . Lemons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Works
111 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
113 S.E. 672 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)