McLeod v. City of Kingfisher

1914 OK CR 175, 142 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 667, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 71
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 12, 1914·No. No. A-1430.·Published

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Dan McLeod, was convicted in the county court of Kingfisher county on appeal from the city court of the city of Kingfisher on a charge of violating a prohibitory ordinance of the city of Kingfisher, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the city jail of Kingfisher for a period of thirty-five days.' The only error of importance raised by this record is a question of the lapse of term of the county court. That question was settled adversely to the contentions of plaintiff in error by this court in the case of Tucker v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 565, 139 Pac. 998.

There being no error sufficient to justify a reversal, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. City of Kingfisher, 1914 OK CR 175, 142 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 667, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 71 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

1914 OK CR 175 (McLeod v. City of Kingfisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. State
1914 OK CR 33 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1914)