McLeod v. Chase

174 So. 470, 128 Fla. 34, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1214
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 12, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the petitioner, who is plaintiff in error named in the case of 'Lyll McLeod v. State, sued out a writ of habeas corpus in which he presented for adjudication the same two questions as questions One and Two presented and discussed in the case of Lyll McLeod v. State, supra.

We determined those questions adversely to the peti *35 tioner. Therefore, the writ should be quashed and petitioner remanded to the custody of the respondent.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. Chase, 174 So. 470, 128 Fla. 34, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1214 (Fla. 1937).

174 So. 470 (McLeod v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.