McLeod v. Astrue

640 F.3d 881
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McLeod v. Astrue. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 F.3d 881
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2011·No. 09-35190·Published

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION FEB 08 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GENE R. McLEOD, No. 09-35190

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 9:07-CV-52-JCL

v. ORDER

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant-Appellee.

Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

The last sentence of the order filed February 4, 2011 stating “No petitions

for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained, and the

mandate shall issue in due course” is withdrawn so that the court can consider

Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing.

Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing is deemed to be appropriately filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. Astrue, 640 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2011).

640 F.3d 881 (McLeod v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gary Thebo v. Cssa
436 F. App'x 774 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Hana Kakos v. Michael Astrue
464 F. App'x 598 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Amy Kelly v. Michael Astrue
471 F. App'x 674 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Molina v. Astrue
674 F.3d 1104 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)